Micah Cowan writes: > > Dominique Leuenberger wrote: > > Absolutely no discussion about the fact to have libproxy as an optional > > component only. > > I think you may have meant "absolutely no disagreement", here? ;) >
Oh, certainly. In other words: we all agree that libproxy will be a non-enforced dependency. As outlined before: try to find and use it, if not skip it. Sorry for the mis-wording. Dominique
