Peter Rosin wrote: > Hi! > > The included snprintf function outputs pointers as signed numbers > leading to bad things<tm>. It seems that you don't wish to use > %p, but it also seems that you do in fact use it. So, this can't > be a bad patch, right? Also think about the poor sods borrowing > your snprintf implementation. Errmh, that would be me, I'm just > contributing back... > > I have attached a patch. Please CC me, I'm not subscribed...
Applied. Though since we're using gnulib now, we should really switch to their implementation. This is a good fix in the meantime. -- Micah J. Cowan http://micah.cowan.name/
