(answers inline) Tobias Senz wrote: > Heja :) > > When using recursive or page requisite downloading local folders are > created. Is there any way to switch that off without loosing the URL? > It would make much sense to me for archival if local files were "flat" > but including as much of the URL as possible. > But, all files in ONE folder. > > Like so, made up example: > > wget -p -k www.google.de > > creates locally the folders / files > ./www.google.de > ./www.google.de/index.html > ./www.google.de/logos > ./www.google.de/logos/olympics10-skeleton-hp.png > > I'd prefer if that were ONLY files > ./[email protected] > ./www.google...@[email protected] > > Or a URL like this > http://www.google.de/csi?v=3&s=webhp&action=&e=17259,17311,22713,23386,23756,23806&ei=JwZ9S-StKYaC_Aatp-z3BA&expi=17259,17311,22713,23386,23756,23806&imc=1&imn=1&imp=1&rt=prt.41,xjsls.93,xjses.163,xjsee.206,xjs.229,ol.468,iml.241 > > locally as file name > www.google...@csi@v...@3@s...@webhp@action@@e...@17259,17311,22713,23386,23756 > [etc ...] > > How would that be possible?
I'm afraid it isn't, currently. > And i'm also having trouble with the way files are named locally, the > "--restrict-file-names=" thingie. > Is there any way to also block "%" "&" "=" (and possibly others i can't > think of right now - "+" maybe?) locally as these seem to prevent > further processing in batch scripts? As mentioned above i'm more of a > fan of "@" for placeholders. Rarely (never?) used in http, and does not > seem to make any trouble when scripting. Wget doesn't currently support arbitrary name restrictions. -- Micah J. Cowan http://micah.cowan.name/
