Zitat von Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>:
Jochen Roderburg <[email protected]> writes:
With a filename coming over Content-Disposition? ;-)
I see now. Sorry the misunderstanding.
I have pushed a fix.
Thanks,
Giuseppe
I have to admit of course, that the combination of a usable
Modify-Date and a Content-Disposition filename will be very rare "in
the wild", but nevertheless possible. I have seen the
Content-Disposition headers mostly when the reply data is dynamically
generated by some web application. Currently I have not even a test
case at hand, a few that I knew have all disappeared from the net.
I would still like to know how the flow of events is now in the cases
that you have changed.
In my understanding the "old" logic was that wget issues a HEAD
request in *all* cases where it needs additional info from the headers
before the real data download starts or to decide that it does not
need to download anything.
And now it gets this info directly from the reply headers of a GET
request? And after having read all these headers it pauses and decides
how to continue? And it stops reading further when it finds out that
no real download is necessary?
J.Roderburg
