Micah Cowan <[email protected]> writes: > Changing the prompt to stderr seems like a simple, single step forward > towards "proper" usage. It's not perfect, but it strikes me as a good > sight better than using stdout, which really ought to be reserved for > "program results"-type output, IMO.
I have applied the original patch, which prompt to stderr instead of stdout. I agree it is not the ideal usage, but the current decision is about use stderr or inhibit the message at all; considering the diagnostic nature of stderr, then the former seems a better choice. Thanks, Giuseppe
