On 16/12/11 20:18, Micah Cowan wrote: > I believe it doesn't chain the way he wants. --no-parents > --include-directories would mean both "don't ascend parents", and "only > include the given directories", whereas he wants "don't ascend parents, > unless it's into the given directories". > > -mjc I guess the --no-parents could be replaced with a include-directories, so --include-directories a/b/*,d/* would probably be equivalent.
Still, that include-directories takes precedence over no-parents seems a sensible thing.
