On 04/17/2012 09:16 AM, Ryan Rawdon wrote: > Micah took a quick look over the source (or was previously familiar with it), > and it sounds like there may be checks in place which should have prevented > this, however I did look to confirm.
I misread; it first checks if the hostname matches, and if so, decides it can reuse the current connection; if the hostname doesn't match, though, it then does further investigation to see whether the underlying address is the same. The check wasn't to preven this situation, it was just meant as a sort of shortcut to avoid looking up IP addresses when the hostname's the same. -mjc
