On 24/04/12 00:34, Micah Cowan wrote:
> On 04/23/2012 02:30 PM, Ángel González wrote:
>> We already have --progress=type, so instead of --progress-bar-only I
>> think it should be
>>
>> --progress=none
> By this I imagine you mean that one should specify --progress=none to
> get the current behavior, and the default will be to show a progress bar
> when -nv is specified?
> I wonder whether this break from historical behavior is likely to be a
> problem? I imagine non-interactive uses probably specify -q if they
> don't want verbosity, but maybe I'm wrong...
Good point. Maybe they should use --progress=bar for that, with an
explicit --progress overriding
a --no-verbose. Or --progress=yes to mean "show a progress bar, in
whatever default you would use if I hadn't provided --no-verbose"
