On 26/11/12 00:04, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > that is a good idea, we can add something like: > > #define MAX_INT_TO_STRING_LEN(x) (sizeof(x) * 24082 / 10000) + 2 > > where `x' in our case will be off_t. > > I am not sure if such a function already exists somewhere. > > Does it improve readability? Well, that just brings the question «Where does 24082 come from?» but if that used for eg. #define STRSIZE_WGINT MAX_INT_TO_STRING_LEN(wgint)
Then using STRSIZE_WGINT would be more readable :)
