Tim Rühsen <[email protected]> writes: > having an abort() without a message is simply a big waste of time for any > developer who stumbles upon it.
I disagree here, what is so difficult that a debugger cannot catch? On the other hand, I agree this can be improved. > Since the init code of Wget has to be rewritten anyways, i provide the > fastest > solution right now: increasing the buffer size and printing a message before > Wget aborts. > > And yes, the whole issue is hell stupid... > - static char buffer[1024]; > + static char buffer[2048]; This won't really fix the problem of having a static buffer, the real fix would be to dynamically allocate the memory. -- Giuseppe
