Am Sonntag, 26. Mai 2013 schrieb Tim Rühsen: > Am Sonntag, 26. Mai 2013 schrieb Javier Vasquez: > > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Tim Rühsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > You can edit wget.texi and change all e.g. '@item <number>' into '@item > > > <string>. I can't test it right here since perl 5.18 is still in > experimental > > > and has some dependancy problems right now. > > > > > > So, this is just an example patch, that should correct the issues with > perl > > > numbers. Not shure how e.g. @item '1' would appear in the man page, so I > take > > > @item 1.. > > > > > >... > > > > > > Regards, Tim > > > > That was really helpful Tim, made me look into texinfo documentation... > > > > The dot, ".", after the number didn't help, I had to place it before > > instead, :-). > > > > Also if one has @item in the immediate following line after another > > @item, that's a failure, since texinfo requires @itemx instead. > > > > And even one has @item followed by @itemx, but with other lines in > > between the 2, somehow that's not understood, and @item is required... > > > > Weird thing... > > > > I'm attaching the patch that worked for me, and I'm pasting how the > > man looks like for the particular exit status after the fix: > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > EXIT STATUS > > Wget may return one of several error codes if it encounters problems. > > > > .0 No problems occurred. > > > > .1 Generic error code. > > > > .2 Parse error - for instance, when parsing command-line > > options, the .wgetrc or .netrc... > > > > .3 File I/O error. > > > > .4 Network failure. > > > > .5 SSL verification failure. > > > > .6 Username/password authentication failure. > > > > .7 Protocol errors. > > > > .8 Server issued an error response. > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > Well, it's able to build now, :-) > > > > -- > > Javier. > > > > Thanks, that's good to hear. > > Could you give a try for "1" or '1' instead of .1 ? > I wonder if that compiles and how it looks in the man page... > IF it works and looks good, maybe you could attach a new patch !? > > Regards, Tim
Sorry, don't bother. I think it won't look as expected in the man page... Regards, Tim
