> > Python 3.3 is no yet available in Debian unstable nor in experimental. > So I made a try with Python 3.2 - which looks good (just an XFAIL: > Test-Post2, > but I didnt go into the details). Why not adjust the requirements to Python > 3.2 (many distributions are derived from Debian or are somewhat > conservative > like e.g. SuSE and Redhat) ? > > I personally find XML hard to read, especially when mixed with HTML. > But I guess, if you create a DTD, we could use one of these XML editors... > these also automatically check (or make shure) the validity of the XML > code. > > Keep up the good work ! > > Hi Tim,
Thanks for the review. The reason I stated Python 3.3 is because I followed the documentation for that version. I'll go back and see if there are any changes between Python 3.2 and 3.3 that make a difference here. Is Python 3.2 an acceptable version? The XFAIL is an Expected Failure. Expected Failures are caused when we know that a certain test WILL fail because there is a problem with the application under test. Maybe I should add some details about XPASS and XFAIL to the documentation. I guess a DTD would be a good option. I haven't really worked with them in the past, but I'll go through a W3Schools tutorial and write one ASAP. Though if XML is not easy to read/write, is there an alternative you would prefer? I am still open to modifying that. -- Thanking You, Darshit Shah
