Darshit Shah <[email protected]> writes:

> This is the same issue that was solved by Stefano through
> commit 9e8d899. Seems like it missed out on the issues in the parallel
> branch.

thanks to have reported it, I have just pushed a fix.

I was worried that the merge went wrong, but luckily it seems to be
another case of the same issue, that was introduced in parallel-wget :-)

-- 
Giuseppe

Reply via email to