Darshit Shah <[email protected]> writes: > @Giuseppe: It's upto you to decide if #709637 should be a blocking > bug. The logs do > seem to show an error on Wget's part, but I haven't had a chance to > create an isolated > test case for it yet. With all the headers available, it shouldn't be > too great an issue.
Given that there is a workaround for it and that it is so difficult to reproduce, I wouldn't consider it as a blocking issue. I'll try to reproduce it on my machine now. Giuseppe
