On Thursday 20 March 2014 23:11:31 Daniel Stenberg wrote: > On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Tim Rühsen wrote: > > I broke out the public suffix code together and created a first go (really > > very quick, distcheck fails - couldn't figure out this evening). > > > > https://github.com/rockdaboot/libpsl > > Ok, I'll be the first to rain on the parade. Sorry but it seems fit to do > this early. > > You do realize that with a *GPL license on the thing, you won't get adopted > by OpenSSL, curl and possibly others?
I knew you were the first to bring this up ;-) > I can't prevent you of course and the decision is yours to make, but I'd > prefer a BSD style license as then I could really consider basing future > enhancements of curl on this effort. I don't care much about the license in this case, since we are talking about something pretty simple. I just concentrated on the code that evening and simply copied the license clauses... I would like to see a consensus here just to avoid further discussions about licenses (there have been far too many). Ángel González already 'voted' for a MIT license. Daniel, you prefer a BSD license. I am OK with either one. Any other votes ? Tim
