Am Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2014, 01:20:17 schrieb Ángel González: > On 21/10/14 09:50, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > > Ángel, > > thanks for the debugging effort! Would you mind to send a separate > > patch that doesn't use strncpy (so to make make dist-check happy), > > probably we can just use memcpy here. > > > > Regards, > > Giuseppe > > The revert to the old behavior was only intended for checking it was the > right place. We have xstrndup() to do just what we want. Please test. > > Regards
Hi Ángel, + return xstrndup (uri, at + *pos, *length);; Shouldn't it be + return xstrndup (at + *pos, *length); ?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
