;-) From my post: > > This patch fixes most C89 warnings for me (-std=c89 -pedantic) since these
If the patch in my original post is OK for you, I'll would like to push it. Tim On Wednesday 19 November 2014 07:17:35 Darshit Shah wrote: > I think we use std=gnu89 or std=gnu99. > > I've been using these and get no warnings on clang anymore. > > What configure command and CFLAGS are you using? I'd like to reproduce > these and try to fix them. > > Thanking You, > Darshit Shah > Sent from mobile device. Please excuse my brevity > > On 19-Nov-2014 2:35 am, "Tim Rühsen" <[email protected]> wrote: > > This patch fixes most C89 warnings for me (-std=c89 -pedantic) since these > > may > > prevent from compiling with MSVC. > > > > There are still some warnings "ISO C forbids conversion of function > > pointer to > > object pointer type [-Wpedantic]" left over. I'll care for these the next > > days. There are architectures where function pointers have a different > > size > > from void *. That's why this warning has a meaning. > > > > Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
