Am Freitag, 5. Dezember 2014, 18:06:15 schrieb Giuseppe Scrivano: > Tim Ruehsen <[email protected]> writes: > > +for CC in gcc clang-3.6; do > > could we replace clang-3.6 with just clang?
;-) Yes On my office machine I do not have a 'clang' command, instead just clang-3.5 and clang-3.6 (but as I tested right now, an 'apt-get install clang' is what fixes it). Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
