Miquel Llobet <mllobet...@gmail.com> writes: > Could this be dinamically allocated? > > Indeed it can! Thanks Giuseppe and Darshit for pointing out. Ideally > we should change all the resp_header_copy calls to resp_header_strdup > (dynamic resp header copy). There is a bit to code to change, as the > function returns are different etc. expect a big patch.
since there is a reasonable upperbound value, can't we just have something like: "char *hdrval = xmalloc(8192);"? What is left to do is ensure we don't leak this buffer when the function exits. Regards, Giuseppe
