> > Miquel, I know you were working on gethttp to increase the header size > to 8kb, if you already have done something, I promise I will rebase your > patch on top of my series :-)
I wasn't done yet so it's okay :-) Actually with this single cleanup label idea it should look a lot better, I'd love to work on that. Miquel Llobet On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Giuseppe Scrivano <gscriv...@gnu.org> wrote: > Hi, > > spring is coming and it is time for some cleanup. > > I have refactored a bit gethttp and moved some code to other functions. > It is mostly mechanical code movements, and I hope to do some more work > on this (if other people want to jump in, you are welcome!) and simplify > gethttp even more. It is still a huge beast, but should be weaker after > the series below. > > I will wait for comments before pushing these patches. > > Miquel, I know you were working on gethttp to increase the header size > to 8kb, if you already have done something, I promise I will rebase your > patch on top of my series :-) > > If some GSoC students want to have something more or less easy to warm > up, here is an idea: move gethttp to use a single cleanup label at the > end of the function. Avoid early exits from gethttp and replace them > with "goto cleanup", all the cleanups must be done after this point > (this means local variables must be properly initialized as they could > be cleaned-up before they were supposed to be). > > Cheers, > Giuseppe > >