I see. I will give it a try and will get back to you. Thank you for your assistance.
Hubert W dniu 25.03.2015 o 22:49, Giuseppe Scrivano pisze: > Please keep bug-wget in CC as it will include more people in the > discussion. > > My refactoring wasn't very logical, I have just moved code outside of > gethttp. I would like that each of these functions would make more sense > and maybe be testable. Makes sense? > > Regards, > Giuseppe > > Il 25 marzo 2015 22:11:47 CET, Hubert Tarasiuk > <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > Hi Giuseppe, > > Yes, I can compile wget from repository. > > I've looked at the function you mentioned. I could do some more cleanup > - mainly by factoring out parts of the code into separate functions - as > I saw in your commits. Would that be appropriate, or did you mean > something different? > > (Not sure if this part of conversation is relevant for entire bug-wget, > so excluded it from CC. Let me know if I should keep CCing that list.) > > Best regards, > Hubert > > > W dniu 25.03.2015 o 21:00, Giuseppe Scrivano pisze: > > Hubert Tarasiuk <[email protected]> writes: > > Hello to everyone, > > My name is Hubert Tarasiuk and I am a CS student at the > University of > Warsaw, Poland (expected graduation date July 2015, B.Sc.). > > I am working on my Google Summer of Code proposal for two of > the GNU > wget ideas': > > Speed up Wget's Download Mechanism > Improve Wget's Security > > > As the deadline is approaching, I would like to start > working on my > patches. After checking the list on GitHub I see, that just > one of the > bugs appears to be good for me: 41002. Others are either > closed/in > progress/in discussion, or already have a patch proposed. > > My question: is the bug I mentioned still good for me, or > perhaps is > someone working on it already? > If latter, can you provide an alternative? Or should I browse > Savannah/Coverity and pick something myself? > > > I think that bug was already fixed and there is not anything > left to do. > > Were you already able to build wget from the git repository? > > I've started working on some cleanup for the gethttp function in the > http.c file, but still there is much left to do, maybe it is > easier for > some fresh eyes to identify better how to make it more readable, > would > you be interested in that? > > Regards, > Giuseppe > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
