Follow-up Comment #4, bug #23281 (project wget):
> What's wrong with pushing/discussing them upstream?
Absolutely nothing; I think that's entirely appropriate. I don't really have a
vested interest in it any longer, though, so it'd probably be better for
someone else to get the ball rolling with them.
> I'm looking at the latest getpass sources and they haven't changed much.
That's part of why I was wondering if they might be opposed to the changes,
simply on the grounds of behavior stability. But even if that's the case, they
probably wouldn't be opposed to a "gnu_getpass2", or perhaps
"set_gnupass_opts", to work around such an issue.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?23281>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
