> From: Gisle Vanem <[email protected]> > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 09:00:43 +0200 > > Compare the attached image wget-progress-1.png: > wget --show-progress --quiet -np -r www.watt-32.net/watt-doc/ > > VS wget-progress-2.png: > wget --show-progress --quiet --limit-rate=2k -np -r > www.watt-32.net/watt-doc/ > > I think it's a bit strange the final d/l speed isn't "sticky" in both cases. > Is it because the speed is too high?
I think the download time is so short that wget doesn't have enough to estimate the speed, before it's all over.
