On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 5:10:35 PM CET Dale R. Worley wrote: > Are the following two commits that I submitted in the current release? > I can't see any signs of them, even though I've gone through the > paperwork and they seemed to be accepted. > > commit de020df92a797aa1b9ad339bb8a01df872ef4f23 > Author: Dale R. Worley <wor...@ariadne.com> > Date: Wed Nov 2 12:14:46 2016 -0400 > > Improve documentation of --trust-server-names. > > commit 98c8d987b1be3e8924dee87e4e78e1e4f2b2eb9e > Author: Dale R. Worley <wor...@ariadne.com> > Date: Sun Oct 16 14:44:15 2016 -0400 > > Amend redirection behavior > > * doc/wget.text: Update documentation. Fix errors and omissions. > * src/convert.h (struct urlpos): Add link_redirect_p flag to struct > urlpos to indicate the URL resulted from a redirection. > * src/recur.c (download_child): Suppress --no-parent check for > redirection URLs. > * src/recur.c (download_child): Suppress directory checks for > redirection URLs and page requisites (if -p). > * src/recur.c (descend_redirect): Set link_redirect_p flag on struct > urlpos for redirection URLs. Remove old test for suppressing directory > checks for redirection URLs.
Hi Dale, thanks, just push patch #1. The second one is still not a candidate for a release. The patch changes some basic / default behavior and we still got no opinions/discussion from anyone testing it. Sorry, but from the old thread there are too many open points. We (hello, list !) should elaborate more on how --no-parent and --page- requisites should work together. Maybe we just have to answer if these should be mutually exclusive or which one has precedence. --span-host, --trust-server-names, --content-disposition and maybe others also influence the behavior... Regards, Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.