Hi, I'll get to a discussion about the proposal shortly, but in the meantime, may I please request everyone to avoid continuing this email thread on summer-of-c...@gnu.org?
That is a generic mailing list for organizing the Summer of Code program within GNU. The discussion about any particular project is off-topic there. It is however,very much on-topic on bug-wget@gnu.org and we should continue this discussion only there. * Tim Rühsen <tim.rueh...@gmx.de> [180322 14:20]: > On 03/22/2018 02:01 PM, Aniketh Gireesh wrote: > > Further, In my opinion, I think it would be better as a different > > library/directory. I think that would be a better refactoring method as > > well as it would be easier to work on the codebase at a later point in > > time. Further, as far as my understanding goes, libwget is a library > > handling HTTP, helping in creating an HTTP request. It seems better to have > > something different to handle DNS and other things regarding that. It would > > feel like all cluttered up inside libwget. > > > > If this is not the way we want it in Wget2, just let me know. I will change > > the proposal as well as the plans for implementation :) > > Since your code will likely use functions from libwget and the other way > round, we should place it in libwget/. But if it makes your development > easier during GSOC, feel free to put it into a separate directory. > > For the future we have a splitting of libwget in several libraries in > mind, but it currently has low priority. We may have some day > libwget-common, libwget-doh, libwget-warc, ... > > Regards, Tim > -- Thanking You, Darshit Shah PGP Fingerprint: 7845 120B 07CB D8D6 ECE5 FF2B 2A17 43ED A91A 35B6
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
