Hi Jeremiah and Barry and thanks for your report Barry.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yeah, hesa (upstream), Ross (current debian maintainer), and I > (potential debian maintainer) have been working on this for a while now. > But collaboration is the name of the game in the world of Free Software > so . . . :) > On Oct 15, 2007, at 5:25 PM, Barry deFreese wrote: >> I am trying to update the packages for Debian using 3.01 and am >> running in to a few issues. >> >> 1. It no longer provides /usr/bin/xnee, should it? > > I think xnee is gone for good - is that right hesa? Correctomundo. Yes, xnee is gone now. It is replaced by cnee. Xnee has been renamed to cnee actually. Read more here: http://www.sandklef.com/xnee/ >> I only get cnee and gnee. There used to be an actual xnee binary, >> is that no more? > Methinks it is gone. xnee is no more. It is replaced by cnee. The program xnee is pining for the fjords. ** Use cnee instead ** >> 2. Even with forcing --enable-gnome-applet I am not getting pnee > > I think the best route to go is to try to just create a deb for gnee and > cnee, we can create a deb for the whole thing later or anther deb for pnee. Pnee is a Gnome Panel Applet. When you say you're not getting it, what do you mean? - If you can't start it from the command line there is nothing wrong. You simple can't do that*. It is installed in the panel applets directory. - Assuming you use Gnome, try adding it (after installation of course) and report back what's not working. Include your distribution (incl version), gnome version etc in the report. *) Well, actually the applet can be started from the command line. But let's not go into details. >> 3. --enable-doc yields "No rule to make target 'xnee.texi', needed by >> 'xnee.info'". That sucks. I know. But it has been fixed, in CVS only. ... and not released, so try out a release here: http://www.sandklef.com/xnee-downloads/nightly-dists/ Latest and not always greatest doc live here btw: http://www.sandklef.com/xnee-downloads/doc/ > The docs have been a source of trouble. They are dynamically built. I > think we are moving towards a more statically built method but hesa will > correct me if I am wrong. Yup, which really rings a bell :( >> 4. --enable-lib doesn't seem to do anything. > Hmm. Hmmmm... at least in CVS head --enable-lib installs Xnee library (libxnee) --disable-lib does not install the lib >> My apologies but please reply to me off-list as I am already on too >> damn many MLs. I know the problem far too well ;) > I understand, but unfortunately this is how we keep it organized, such > as it is. :-/ > I will cc you but I think we prefer to have the list be the central > repository as it were. cc is fine with me :) /hesa Henrik Sandklef Maintainer GNU Xnee Free Software Conference in Gothenburg: www.fscons.org _______________________________________________ Bug-xnee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-xnee
