On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 04:28:56AM +0900, YONETANI Tomokazu wrote: > openpam_load_module() says "no pam_XXX.so found" when the module > failed to load. It failed loading because of a missing symbol > login_getpwclass, which is defined in libutil, but qpopper isn't > linked against it. The following command installs qpopper linked > against libutil, but it doesn't seem to be a correct solution though.
I hate programs doing nasty stuff in fork() without allowing non-daemon operation. Yeah, I've been looking at it today as well -- pam_unix wasn't linked with -lutil. /me slaps himself for not seeing the obvious problem when pam_permit.so worked. Joerg
