Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > Dmitry Lohansky wrote: >> But is more better mark process as sleeping only if _all_ of this lwps >> are in sleeping state. > > I'm not sure. Maybe we should display all lwps for the time being. > This for sure is an area of discussion. >
personally, I'm a fan of having this be runtime selectable - sometimes you want to see what the system is doing, other times you want to see what a few programs are doing.. but feel free mod my comment -1 for no code attachment :)
