Matthew Dillon wrote: > Ok, I'm looking at the core. There do not appear to be any > memory leaks but HAMMER got behind on reclaiming inodes whos ref > count has dropped to 0. > > In looking at the code I see a case that I am not handling in > VOP_SETATTR. Was the code you were running doing a lot of chmod, > chown, or other operations on file paths that do not require open()ing > the file?
Definitely. Every time I got a crash, the machine was re-creating an hourly rsnapshot arborescence from the previous one. It should have been a mix of mkdir / chmod / chown ... -- Francois Tigeot
