On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:49:59 +0300
Hasso Tepper <[email protected]> wrote:
> Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> > That's something I have never seen happening, even when I do
> > have a high load of filesystem activity, discs running at 100% for
> > extended periods while largeish trees get moved around. The system
> > certainly gets sluggish under that kind of load but nowhere near as bad
> > as that.
>
> My experience is comparable with corecode's experience. Even moderate IO
> load makes my audio stutter, my prompts apps hang for some seconds time
> to time etc. It's HAMMER + AHCI. It's not a conncurrent IO issue we
Interesting because I'm using HAMMER + NATA, heavy IO load will
make video playback stutter but I've yet to make audio stutter.
Corecode - are you using NATA or AHCI ?
> obviously have (due to lack of IO scheduler). Surprisingly my UFS + NATA
> machine performs much better in this regard.
Can you try HAMMER + NATA ?
> Not to mention http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issue1502 which became
> showstopper for DragonFly + HAMMER deploying for me.
I have no nohistory mounts but I delete 5GB files fairly often with
no ill effects on normal mounts.
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays
C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/
