Issue #2393 has been updated by John Marino.
I agree with Sascha except for the last line. We've run into ETIME problems at least once before. In that case, we just changed the enumeration because it wasn't being used anyway for the reasons listed above. So in general, when I see ETIME, I suspect the software first. ---------------------------------------- Bug #2393: ETIME not defined in /usr/include/errno.h, current pkgsrc libdrm 2.4.37 intel_bufmgr_gem.c won't build http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/2393 Author: David Shao Status: New Priority: Normal Assignee: Category: Target version: /usr/include/errno.h from latest DEVEL-3.1 does not appear to define ETIME. ETIME appears to be associated with STREAMS as an option in the POSIX standard; therefore, if STREAMS is not implemented, there may be good reason for it to not be defined. Even if ETIME is to be deliberately not defined, there needs to be some recommendation on what its value should be for porting applications such as libdrm 2.4.37. -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/my/account
