DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11800>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11800 Invalid response headers ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-23 22:01 ------- Jim commented > Only on the principle of least-astonishment would I say we should allow this, > but working around broken implementations by ignoring and disregarding the > RFC > is *not* a fruitful path. I agree it sucks. But the same parser and evaluation is used for CGI and ISAPI, and many users have propritary (3rd party) CGI-type applications in compiled form that they CANNOT easily replace or modify. I've seen similar reports of this bug on the CGI side of the equation. As long as we once tollerated this carelessness, and it led to the proliferation of these borked clients, I'm afraid in the interest of alieviating the mental and physical health of puzzled administrators we should be somewhat gracious in handling these exceptions. Neither MS nor the CGI authors will suffer the ulcers from this, only our fans and users. problems (mental --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
