DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7862>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7862 suexec never log a group name. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Major |Enhancement ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-21 19:58 ------- A few comments... The change with this patch is that 1) if group name is specified as a number, the patched code now does a lookup to find the name so that log messages show the name 2) if the group name is specified as a number and it is invalid, the error will be caught a little sooner The cost of this patch is an extra group database lookup. It could be considered a feature that suexec won't read /etc/groups if the group is specified numerically. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
