DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7741>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7741 some directives may be placed outside of proper context without causing an error ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 17:26 ------- The LimitRequest* directives are (kind of) half valid in VH context. They fully apply to IP-based VHs and to the default Name-based VH (i.e. the first one with the particular IP/Port combination). TimeOut has btw. the same restriction. Quite complicated. I'm not sure, whether it's so easy to detect at configuration time, which type of VH is currently processed. And I'm not sure, whether it's so useful to document it that way. Opinions? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
