DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15869>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15869 cache ignores max-age cache-directive ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-08 18:43 ------- Note that bug 21392 (that you mentioned as related) depends on Expires header present. This bug does not. IIRC, this bug also prevents us from testing Apache against few other related RFC 2616 requirements, including max-age and Expires relationship. Hope you can nail it down! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
