DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16521>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16521 caches MUST treat invalid Expires values as in the past ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-21 19:09 ------- IMO, yes, you do. Recall that we are talking about cache freshness here. A cache is a performance optimization with serious freshness side-effects. We should err on the safe side (generate a miss, not a hit) whenever there are doubts. The above does not mean that implementation should reject messages with invalid expiration dates, of course. Just treat them as stale. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
