DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25123>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25123 304 - Not Modified does not return Expires/Cache-Control headers ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-01 20:48 ------- Both responses look correct to me. From RFC 2616: 10.3.5 304 Not Modified [...] The response MUST include the following header fields: [...] - Expires, Cache-Control, and/or Vary, if the field-value might differ from that sent in any previous response for the same variant So if the fields don't differ, they may or may not be sent, right? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
