DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27751>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27751

Segmentation Fault in shmcb_cyclic_cton_memcpy





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-03-19 18:55 -------
It seems to me that src_offset and src_len are getting corrupted somehow, but 
it's not 
obvious to me where or how this is happening. The versions you're using of 
redhat, 
glibc, gcc (etc) are a little dated. and though I'm reluctant to dismiss the 
issue as 
being old tools, it would certainly be something to consider - if you're able 
to build 
using a different gcc or mess with the optimisation levels, that might hint as 
to whether 
this is compiler sensitive or something more macabre. 
 
Also, is it possible to insert some debugging lines in the last two frames 
around the 
problem area to dump the exact values being passed around? I'm curious how and 
where those values are getting mangled. As/when you hit a segfault, it would be 
useful 
to have something to help pinpoint where the corruption was introduced. 
(Another 
possible hint: could those "corrupt" values actually be some unsigned 
representation 
of a negative - indicating a possible bug in the "cyclic" logic?) I've added 
myself to the 
CC line for this ticket, please let me know how you get on with this.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to