DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27966>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27966 Expect: 100-continue not honored for Content-Length: 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-03 23:20 ------- Interesting... my interpretation of 2616: the "MAY omit a 100 (Continue)" clause is pointless if it does not modify the "MUST"/"MUST NOT" requirements; i.e. it explicitly makes it valid for an origin server omit a 100 continue response if all of the body has already been received. What other meaning could the clause have? By that interpretation, 2.0's behaviour is compliant with 2616 for the "C-L: 0" case, and it seems reasonable. I'd ask the httpwg list for clarification if you're really convinced this is wrong; please re-open the bug report if httpwg agrees with you. :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
