DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35122>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35122 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-05 15:49 ------- I assumed that scope id in the IPv6 literal address notation is interesting only to the machine where it was used, and was used to select an interface to use on the outbound, or identify an interface on the outbound. It is not part of the IPv6 header after all. So a client may indeed specify a scope id on a connect() but it doesn't make since in a Host since the client's view of the scope isn't interesting on the server (the server may indeed get a different scope in sin6_scope_id when the client address is reported from accept() or getpeername()). Based on this discussion I'm willing to assume that this understanding was naive/incomplete/completely-ignorant/etc. Do you have a pointer to a good description? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
