DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32177>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32177





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-06-14 04:49 -------
Created an attachment (id=15396)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15396&action=view)
proposed patch to support SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF on Win32

Here is the correct (famous last words) patch for this issue.  The
apr_is_option_set() optimization does not apply to these socket
options.  (patch posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] regarding that misplaced
optimization in the Unix code)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to