DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36324>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36324 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-30 13:05 ------- Apologies for the slight delay replying - I've been away over a long weekend. > I wonder if this is another manifestation of the subrequest+filter issues > discussed re: Bug 17629? Are you mixing main- and sub-request output streams > via different filter configs? (mod_diagnostics might help find out, if > that's > a difficult question). Not sure exactly how you mean "different filter configs", but I suspect yes. We use mod_include heavily, but our own code sometimes creates additional subrequests (the ones you see going through mod_proxy in the backtrace above). These subrequests have a custom input filter (which creates their "request") and output filter (which may or may not modify the response data) added using ap_add_input_filter/ap_add_output_filter. The output from those is passed back up to the originating request (which could be either the main one, or a SSI generated subrequest, and doesn't have the custom filters). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
