DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34844>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34844 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-15 21:30 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > The <sessionid> was logged as "%2EW1" and not ".W1", though. It seems as if > mod_proxy_balancer.c checks against '.', but doesn't URL decode the string > first (if it had, it shouldn't have logged it encoded): I am currently unsure if it is ok to expect that the '.' in the sessioncookie that separates sessionid and route can be URL encoded. So lets see the opinion of other developers on this topic. I tend to say: No. Nevertheless, if it is found ok to be URL encoded, I think the following patch would be better: Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c =================================================================== --- modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c (Revision 320868) +++ modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ *end_cookie = '\0'; if((end_cookie = strchr(cookie, ',')) != NULL) *end_cookie = '\0'; + ap_unescape_url_keep2f(cookie); return cookie; } } -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
