DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37100>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37100 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-19 22:05 ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > > The real solution is that AJP should have a FLUSH packet/command, IMO. > > Paul - you are facing a existing specification, ajp13, where we do not have > that That was also my complaint in comment #6. But we cannot adjust AJP/1.3, so we must find a bandaid that fixes that protocol shortcoming. I think the question is more if the bandaid I found is good or bad. > flexibility. It sounds like an excellent suggestion for the ajp15 spec which Maybe AJP/1.4. Does someone know where to find an AJP/1.4 specfication? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
