DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36906>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36906 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-25 18:41 ------- Have to correct myself: the config you proposed _does_ work. Should´ve been more accurate when testing it.... The second part of my comment, however, still applies: if things work like you say one cannot have different paths on the backend servers. Sometimes this would come in very handy. On the other hand: if things work like you say, the majority of cases should be covered. Perhaps the docs could be enhanced to better describe the way the configuration works. Adding the path to the BalancerMember parameter seemed quite natural to me since the port to be used on the respective backend is given there - so why not the path also?! Anyway: thanks for your effort and thanks for mod_proxy_balancer: it is a powerfull enrichment for the httpd! -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
