DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28712>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28712 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|sdbm under MS- |sdbm nonfunctional when |Windows95/98/Me does not |sparse/zero fill isn't |work correctly |default for fs ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-11 00:34 ------- Win 9x demonstrates the bug, but brainstorming here, we believe that it could also depend upon the filesystem, meaning that other platforms might not make the zero-fill assumption. So perhaps this should become an autoconf detected feature, and implement for Win9x. But notice you patch doesn't test for Win9x, you tested the compile time Win32 which is also true of WinNT, and that's not acceptable. Will consider a more appropriate patch testing oslevel at runtime. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
