DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37791>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37791 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-28 01:17 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > if (!(sc->enabled && sslconn && (ssl = sslconn->ssl))) > should become > if ( !sc->enabled || !sslconn || (ssl != sslconn->ssl) ) > > Right ? No. 1. Your version is nearly the same as above because !(sc->enabled && sslconn && (ssl = sslconn->ssl)) is equal to !sc->enabled || !sslconn || !(ssl == sslconn->ssl) keep in mind that ssl = sslconn->ssl and ssl == sslconn->ssl are different things. So the original condition becomes true if sslconn->ssl is equal to NULL which is only checked if sslconn is different from NULL. But I need to check on the trunk where the current condition is somewhat different and maybe also wrong. So thanks for the pointer. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
