DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39243>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39243 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-14 14:00 ------- > I'm fairly reluctant to add a config directive for this. I can understand your point of view. > I would be happy with a "one size fits most" hard-coded limit if we could arrive at such a value; what is your input on changing the limit to 256K? IMHO Since I work in support/engineering I can honestly say we have customers that are using soap messages anywhere from 1k to 40mb in size (or higher). So, if you are asking for my input regarding any hard coded value I would have to vote for the 40mb-50mb range. While I agree those values seem absurd for most small web site, but large SOAP web sites will need this type of limit out of the box. Without a large hard-coded value customers are going to request vendors like RedHat to give them a supported version of the Apache web Server with a higher hard coded value because their existing applications that have been deployed all over the world just stopped working when they installed http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/120313. (Ive already had three customers) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
