DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40910>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40910 Summary: configuration problem with more than 1 balancer Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.2.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: mod_proxy_balancer AssignedTo: [email protected] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When defining more than 1 proxy balancers the system sometimes ignores configurations and takes the first balancer for all requests. ErrorLog and configtest say everything is ok, the effect seems to be depending of the order of configuration The following configuration doesn't work <VirtualHost xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx> <Proxy balancer://cluster1> BalancerMember http://10.x.x.x loadfactor=20 retry=60 BalancerMember http://10.x.x.y loadfactor=10 retry=60 </Proxy> <Proxy balancer://cluster2> BalancerMember http://10.x.x.x:8080 loadfactor=20 retry=60 BalancerMember http://10.x.x.y:8080 loadfactor=10 retry=60 </Proxy> RewriteEngine on RewriteRule ^/specialpath/(.*)$ balancer://cluster2/specialpath/$1 [NC,P,L] RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ balancer://cluster1/$1 [P,L] </VirtualHost> Every request to specialpath is routed to the webs linked in cluster1 If I change the sequence of the 2 balancers it works <VirtualHost xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx> <Proxy balancer://cluster2> BalancerMember http://10.x.x.x:8080 loadfactor=20 retry=60 BalancerMember http://10.x.x.y:8080 loadfactor=10 retry=60 </Proxy> <Proxy balancer://cluster1> BalancerMember http://10.x.x.x loadfactor=20 retry=60 BalancerMember http://10.x.x.y loadfactor=10 retry=60 </Proxy> RewriteEngine on RewriteRule ^/specialpath/(.*)$ balancer://cluster2/specialpath/$1 [NC,P,L] RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ balancer://cluster1/$1 [P,L] </VirtualHost> Balancer Manager Webpage shows both clusters, but in case 1 the ports of cluster 2 are "lost", in case 2 it is shown correctly with port 8080 With 3 or more backend clusters this issue would be even more complicated to test -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
