DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41177>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41177 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-14 14:18 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > The POST is sent from a javascript (jscript) client (xmlhttp-ajax-type method) > > to the server and collected with PHP 5.2.0. I assumed that this was a > > function of the web server and not PHP. Maybe I'm wrong, but PHP 5.2.0 worked > Yes and no. Maybe PHP uses a function provided by httpd's API or by apr or by > apr-util to do this and I would not rule out per se that there can be an error > in this code. > OTH I doubt that PHP uses code from httpd / apr / apr-util to perform this kind > of operation as it is designed to run in and with different webservers not only > httpd. So it does not really make sense for them to rely on webserver specific > code for such a generic operation. > I guess the best starting point for this is to open a bug with PHP at > http://bugs.php.net/. This at least allows to narrow things down and if it turns > out that a call to httpd / apr / apr-util code delivers the wrong result simply > come back here and open a new report with the specific error that has been > found. Thus marking the report invalid for now. > Ok fair enough. Thanks for your help. I can get around the bug with php code in the POST data receipt container, but I will file a bug report with PHP. Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
